Decision 1
Define the assembly
Specify topology, segment layout, magnetization directions, datums, and working gap in a controlled drawing or CAD package.
Manufacturer selection · RFQ preparation
Prepare a project-specific RFQ, check what a manufacturer can substantiate, and agree on acceptance before committing to a custom array.
Lead time, unit cost, and achievable field performance depend on the released design and supplier process. This page prepares the review; it does not promise a generic estimate.
Choose the project conditions to see which details to include in your request for quotation. The checklist updates locally.
If undecided, state the operating conditions and ask for a material recommendation.
Your quote preparation checklist
Linear array · Not decided · need help defining acceptance · prototype / first article
8 RFQ details ready to review
Use this project-specific checklist to request comparable manufacturer evidence and a written quote.
This tool prepares an RFQ; it does not calculate feasibility, unit price, or delivery time. Those require a drawing, material review, and a supplier-specific quotation.
Send a drawing or CAD file with your target application and operating conditions.
A useful comparison starts with the same design inputs and acceptance criteria for every manufacturer.
Decision 1
Specify topology, segment layout, magnetization directions, datums, and working gap in a controlled drawing or CAD package.
Decision 2
State whether acceptance covers dimensions, magnetic properties, or an assembled field map, including the method and pass limits.
Decision 3
Ask which site performs each operation and request records tied to the same process and inspection plan as your order.
Ask for evidence tied to your part, the factory site, and the agreed inspection plan. A brochure or a generic capability claim is not enough to compare suppliers.
| Checkpoint | Ask the manufacturer | Request evidence | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing scope | Identify the legal manufacturer and the factory site for magnet production, machining, magnetization, array assembly, and final inspection. | A process flow, site address, and a clear list of in-house and outsourced operations. | Confirms who owns each process and where changes or quality issues must be handled. |
| Design review | Request a DFM review of segment geometry, magnetization directions, tolerances, assembly access, and the proposed fixture. | Marked-up drawing or review record with assumptions, unresolved inputs, and revision identifiers. | Shows whether the supplier has reviewed your actual design instead of quoting from a generic description. |
| Material and operating limits | Confirm the exact material grade, coating, magnetization direction, temperature range, and environmental conditions for the application. | Material specification or lot record, plus written confirmation of the limits used in the supplier review. | Makes the material choice traceable to the operating envelope; a family name alone is not a complete specification. |
| Assembly and inspection | Agree how the array will be fixtured and handled, which characteristics will be inspected, and how field measurements will be made if required. | First-article plan, measurement setup, calibration evidence, sample size, and an example inspection report. | Lets both sides agree on the acceptance method before production and avoid disputes over an undefined result. |
| Commercial and schedule | Separate prototype, tooling, recurring unit, inspection, packaging, and shipping costs; request a dated schedule against a frozen specification. | Quotation with quantity basis, validity, assumptions, exclusions, milestones, and the date each lead-time estimate starts. | Makes price and timing comparable across quotes without treating a generic market range as a project commitment. |
ISO 9001 is a quality-management-system standard. Treat a certificate as system evidence, check its organization and site scope, and separately agree product-specific requirements and inspection. The distinction follows the scope described by ISO.
Have a released drawing?
Ask the engineering team to review the design and acceptance criteria for a project-specific quotation.
If the application depends on a field at a working plane, bore, or air gap, define where and how it will be measured. State the probe orientation, measurement positions, units, calibration evidence, sample size, and pass/fail limits. Magnetic-field meters and Hall probes are available for permanent-magnet measurement, but the instrument does not set your product acceptance criteria.
Review magnetic measurement equipmentMeasurement equipment reference reviewed October 11, 2026. Select a probe and method for the geometry and field range of your part.
Each risk has a concrete RFQ or first-article action so it can be handled before a production commitment.
A field-strength or uniformity number is ambiguous unless the reference plane, positions, probe orientation, units, and acceptance limits are stated.
Action: Attach a measurement sketch or map and agree on the report format and pass/fail rule before the first article.
Strong attraction and repulsion between segments can make positioning difficult and can damage brittle magnet parts or surrounding components.
Action: Ask for the fixture, assembly sequence, containment approach, and operator handling plan to be reviewed during DFM.
Temperature, corrosion exposure, speed, and demagnetizing conditions affect the suitable grade, coating, and retention design.
Action: Provide continuous and peak operating conditions and request written confirmation of the material and coating assumptions.
The evidence that matters changes as the drawing and production plan mature.
The design is still changing or the field acceptance limit is not yet fixed.
Next step: Request a DFM review, a first-article inspection plan, and separately listed fixture and engineering charges. Agree on open assumptions before ordering.
The drawing and acceptance criteria are released and the supplier is being asked to scale.
Next step: Ask for capacity and process-change controls, lot traceability, quantity-based pricing, and a schedule tied to material availability and specification freeze.
A second manufacturer must reproduce the assembly or correct a known performance issue.
Next step: Share the controlled drawing and current inspection records, identify the failure or variation to correct, and compare first articles against the same acceptance plan.
Practical answers for engineering and procurement teams.
Send a drawing or CAD file, topology, segment count, magnetization directions, quantity, operating conditions, destination, and the dimensional or magnetic acceptance criteria. Mark unknowns so the supplier can identify assumptions instead of silently filling them in.
No. A reliable price or schedule depends on the released geometry, material availability, tooling, inspection requirements, quantity, and shipping scope. The checklist prepares the inputs; request a dated, supplier-specific quotation for the actual project.
No. ISO 9001 concerns an organization’s quality management system. Treat a certificate as one piece of system evidence, check its organization and site scope, and separately approve the product drawing, measurement method, and acceptance limits.
Not always. Use field measurement when the application depends on a defined field at a working plane, air gap, bore, or active region. If it is required, specify the measurement locations, probe orientation, units, limits, and report format; the instrument alone does not define acceptance.
Specify functional requirements and ask the manufacturer to propose a process that can meet them. A process name or software brand does not establish capability; review the supplier’s design-specific analysis, measurement plan, and first-article evidence.
Ask for the site address and operation-by-operation process flow, identify subcontracted steps, and request recent sample records with sensitive customer details removed. For a critical program, agree on an audit or process review before release.
Share your array topology, requirements, and operating conditions with the engineering team for a project-specific DFM and quotation review.
Contact engineeringReviewed October 11, 2026